The full business review

demowho and where

Not a feature. Sign-in decides both of these; until then, this does.

Demo map
Company

The full business review

Mehta Auto Components Pvt Ltd, Bhosari MIDC, Pune · assembled Monday 31 August · 6 findings

Updated 2026-08-26T16:05:00+05:30Section 1 of 11
01

Read this first

Mehta Auto earns well, collects late, and runs on memory.

₹42,00,000 is waiting past sixty days. The collection cycle Anil calls 45–50 days runs at 74 in the books.

Four customers carry 68% of billing — and the head of sales says two of them are one buying group.

9 of the 32 people who sat for a conversation could say what the company is trying to achieve. 3 of the 6 findings are about records nobody can read.

Three moves this quarter

  1. 1Collect the four oldest invoices, one at a time. Accounts already carries the goal.
  2. 2Switch on the enquiry register. It is built; it waits on one approval.
  3. 3Agree the goals, and put one in front of every person.

3 of 4 heads have written back.

02

Where the business stands, branch by branch

Four branches are strained, two are holding, and two cannot be graded at all.

  • holdingDemand and customersagainst the industry on public record

    Revenue grew and both anchors are still buying. The exposure, not the demand, is the problem: one customer is 31% and the top four are 68%.

    Your revenue index rose to 112.5 over two filed years. The industry's rose to 120.1. You grew, and lost share while doing it.

  • strainedPricing and marginagainst your own filed years

    Anchor volume rose while anchor rates did not. Pricing power is demonstrable with small accounts and absent with the large ones.

    Net margin by filed year is the only comparison available. Margin by customer needs item-level cost the ledgers do not carry, so the question 'which customer is the profitable one' cannot be answered at all.

  • strainedCash and working capitalagainst the spread inside your own books

    The collection cycle runs at 74 days against a belief of 45 to 50, and ₹42,00,000 is past sixty days.

    The only customer settling inside 25 days is the smallest one on the list. Every anchor invoice is past sixty. The spread is not about the market — it is about which customers are asked.

  • No record to read it fromCapacity and operationsno comparison exists

    Line and machine output exist in no connected source. The daily production log is registered for its update times only, because its contents cannot be parsed.

    Missing

    A production log that can be read. Until then there is no number here to grade, and no honest way to invent one.

  • No record to read it fromQuality and deliveryno comparison exists

    The monthly rejection report was described in onboarding and is no longer produced. Nothing else records rework or rejection.

    Missing

    Any record of rejection or rework at all. This is the one branch where the data was once produced and stopped.

  • strainedPeople and organisationagainst your own filed years

    28% of the people asked could say what the company is trying to achieve, and it falls from 57% at the heads to 14% two levels down. Seven people work to someone other than the manager on the chart.

    Contributing headcount is on the public record month by month, so growth in people can be set against growth in revenue. Nothing external measures whether people know the goal.

  • strainedSystems and visibilityagainst your own filed years

    Rung 2 of 5. Five of the nine reports the company runs on cannot be read by anything except the person who makes them, and two of the most-used files were described by nobody.

    The rung is the comparison, and it is the one that moves quarter to quarter. Nothing outside this company grades it.

  • holdingCompliance and governanceagainst your own filed years

    Returns are filed, some of them late, and lateness has tracked cash rather than intent. The auditor has been continuous since 2016 and charges are properly registered.

    Filing timeliness is on the public record month by month, so the pattern is visible against your own past without needing anyone else's.

03

6 findings

Six findings. One is priced; the money in the others arrives when their records exist.

Accounts₹42,00,000 has been outstanding for more than sixty days₹42,00,000

What we found

₹73,70,400 is outstanding across nine open invoices. ₹42,00,000 of it has been open longer than sixty days, the oldest for 88. The founder puts the collection cycle at 45 to 50 days; across settled invoices in the last twelve months it runs at 74.

What it means

Money already earned and already spent on producing is sitting with four customers for two and a half months. The GST returns that went in late went in late because the cash had not arrived — the same cycle, arriving as a compliance problem.

What it's worth

Tally: as of yesterday 7:40 PMPast sixty days, against a cycle the company believes runs at fifty.The four open invoices older than sixty days, at their outstanding balance.

What to do

Take the four invoices over sixty days one at a time this month, oldest first, and put the ageing on the same page as the filing calendar.

Records

  • RecordTally - outstanding invoices with dates, via the read-only agent· Open invoices and ageing buckets· last sync 25 Aug 2026 19:40· in the books
  • ComputedComputed by Corto· Average days to collect, trailing twelve months· 25 Aug 2026· in the books
  • StatedThe founder, in his interview· Interview sittings 19 Aug 2026 - 22 Aug 2026· 22 Aug 2026

Corrected 24 Aug: the first draft counted a settled invoice. Accounts caught it before anyone else saw the document.

The head of Accounts had not responded when this was assembled on Monday 31 August.

CompanyThe largest customer is a third of the business, not a fifthDisagreed

What we found

Party-wise billing puts the largest customer at 31% of revenue and the top four at 68%. Asked cold on two occasions two days apart, the founder put the largest at 20–22% both times.

What it means

The share he prices against, staffs against and accepts a frozen rate against is nine points below the share in his own ledgers. Anchor volume has risen while anchor rates have not, so the same customers are buying more work for the same money.

What it's worth

One customer's decision moves 31% of revenue. Not costed here — margin by customer needs item-level cost, which the ledgers do not carry.

What to do

Put the top four on one page with the date each rate was last moved, and open a rate conversation with one of them this quarter.

Records

  • RecordTally - party-wise sales ledgers, via the read-only agent· Party-wise billing FY26 YTD· last sync 25 Aug 2026 19:40· in the books
  • StatedThe founder, in his interview· Interview sittings 19 Aug 2026 - 22 Aug 2026· 22 Aug 2026
DisagreedHead of Sales2026-08-27

31% is the billing share, not the risk. Two of the top four are the same buying group, so the real single-decision exposure is higher than the number here, not lower. Please show it that way before the meeting.

ProductionA supervisor layer runs the floor and appears on no chartConfirmed

What we found

The employee master routes eleven people to one manager. Five of them named him. Seven people across the company named a day-to-day manager other than the one the file lists — four of them in Production, and those four land on just two names, neither of which the file lists as anyone's manager.

What it means

Two shifts are run by people who hold no recorded responsibility for anyone. Every instruction that layer gives is unbacked, and every escalation that should stop there is addressed a level too high.

What it's worth

Six of the eleven are in practice managed by someone the chart does not know about. Not costed — nothing in the books prices a reporting line.

What to do

Put the two shift supervisors on the chart with the four people who already work to them, and confirm the rest of the eleven before this quarter's goals reach people.

Records

  • StatedEmployee master spreadsheet supplied by the company· Mehta Auto - Employee Master (Jul 2026).xlsx, uploaded 19 Aug 2026· 19 Aug 2026
  • StatedEach person's own selection when they confirmed their details· Details confirmed, to 26 Aug 2026· 26 Aug 2026
ConfirmedHead of Production and Dispatch & Stores2026-08-27

Correct, and it has been that way since the second line started. Put it on the chart.

SalesInbound arrives and nobody counts itAdded

What we found

No enquiry register exists anywhere in the company and no CRM is connected, so the number of enquiries received and the share that became orders cannot be computed. One enquiry sent through the company's own contact form on 21 August, with permission, was still unanswered four days later. The founder's stated view is that inbound is not worth chasing; the company's last new customer came from that channel.

What it means

The one channel that has produced a new customer is the channel nobody measures and nobody is accountable for answering. The view of it has never had to survive a count, because no count exists.

What it's worth

Not costed. One enquiry on one occasion is not a rate, and nothing in the public record can say how many arrived or what they were worth.

What to do

Register every enquiry where it lands — the form, the phone and the shared sales mailbox — so next quarter has a count to argue with.

Records

  • RecordCorto enquiry sent through the customer's own contact form· Sent Thu 21 Aug 2026 16:10; observed to Mon 25 Aug 2026· 25 Aug 2026
  • StatedThe founder, in his interview· Interview sittings 19 Aug 2026 - 22 Aug 2026· 22 Aug 2026
AddedHead of Sales2026-08-27

The form goes to a mailbox two of us can open and neither of us owns. The Nashik enquiry sat there four days for the same reason. We have asked for a shared sales inbox since March.

CompanyNine reports run the company; four of them can be readConfirmed

What we found

Nine reports were described in onboarding. Four sit in a system Corto can read. Three live on individual laptops, one in an unconnected Drive account, and one is no longer produced at all. Separately, two files nobody described are edited every working morning and opened by four people each.

What it means

Weekly decisions rest on files that exist in one person's possession — when that person is away the decision is made without the report, or not made. And the two most-used files in the company were invisible to the question "what reports do you make?", because people do not call their own habits reports.

What it's worth

Five of the nine reports the company runs on cannot be read by anything except the person who makes them.

What to do

Collect the four missing reports into the connected drive this week and register the two files nobody named, so the next quarter computes from them instead of around them.

Records

  • StatedWhat each person described about the reports they make· Artifact register, described rows, to 26 Aug 2026· 26 Aug 2026
  • RecordThe connected shared drive - file listing and revision history· Drive scan, 26 Aug 2026· 26 Aug 2026 16:05
ConfirmedHead of Quality2026-08-28

The head of Sales and The head of Production and Dispatch & Stores had not responded when this was assembled on Monday 31 August.

ProductionCapacity cannot be computed from anything connectedAdded

What we found

The daily production log is registered for its update times only — its contents are never read, because merged cells and formula columns cannot be parsed. No other connected source carries line or machine output. The founder puts utilisation at about 80%.

What it means

The one number that decides whether to buy the next machine has nothing behind it. A new line stands idle while an old one runs overtime, and no connected record can say by how much.

What it's worth

Not costed. Nothing connected carries output, so any rupee here would be invented. The file's format, not the management, is the reason the number does not exist.

What to do

Rebuild the production log as flat rows, one line per row, so next quarter computes utilisation instead of estimating it.

Records

  • RecordDaily Production Log (shared drive), registered cadence-only· Daily Production Log.xlsx - merged cells and formula columns; content parsing off· 26 Aug 2026 06:20
  • StatedThe founder, in his interview· Interview sittings 19 Aug 2026 - 22 Aug 2026· 22 Aug 2026
AddedHead of Production and Dispatch & Stores2026-08-27

The merged cells are mine. I built the sheet that way so it prints on one page for the morning meeting. I can keep a flat copy alongside it.

04

Does everyone know where this is going?

The plan in people's heads is not the plan — 9 of 32 carry all three parts of it.

28%9 clearly · 11 roughly · 12 not at all — of the 32 people who had their conversation. 4 of the 36 eligible have not sat yet.
  • In your own words, what is this company trying to achieve this year?14 of 32 clear

    Sell more than last year, I think. Nobody has told us a number.

    Keep Sundaram happy. That is the goal as far as I can see.

    One hundred fifty crore by 2029. And exports. It was said at Diwali.

  • What's your part in that?12 of 32 clear

    If my part moves late, the invoice goes out late. That much I know.

    I do my work. How it connects to the top, honestly, nobody has ever drawn me that line.

  • What would a good week look like for you?9 of 32 clear

    A good week is when nobody shouts. That is the only measure I have.

    No complaints from the customer, no breakdown. Beyond that I would not know how to score it.

Where it is lost

  • Department heads57%
  • Their teams22%
  • One level below that14%

The founder's own level is not here. His conversation was the interview, and the rubric everyone else was scored against is built from what he said in it.

Departments too small to report on their own are counted here but not shown separately: Leadership (1) · Purchase (2) · HR & Admin (2).

Nobody in Maintenance has been asked yet, so it is not in this number at all.

05

What gets in the way

The same obstructions repeat across departments, in the counts people gave them.

  • 9Transporter booking app wastes time daily

    Same details, typed twice, every single day. The tracker and then their portal.

    Named in Production.

    Also named in a department too small to report separately — the count includes them, the name does not.

  • 8Dispatch and accounts don't share information

    The people loading the truck know things the office finds out three days later. Same building.

    Named in Sales.

    Named by people in three functions; two of them are too small to report separately.

  • 15No clarity on what counts as a good week

    Tell me what number I am supposed to move and I will move it. Nobody ever has.

    Named in Production and Sales.

    Also named in a department too small to report separately.

06

Where what you told us and what the books say do not match

Where memory and the books disagree, both are kept.

  • You said

    top customer ~20-22% — twice, two days apart

    The books say

    31%; top-4 = 68%

  • You said

    money made in precision/Sundaram work

    The books say

    margin by customer uncomputed — his own declined number

  • You said

    inbound is junk

    The books say

    last new customer originated inbound

  • You said

    collections 45-50 days

    The books say

    74 days

  • You said

    power is 3-4% of cost

    The books say

    6.8%

  • You said

    capacity utilisation ~80%

    The books say

    not computable from any connected source

07

What we could not see, and what it is costing

Of 9 described reports, four are in a system Corto can read. Three live on individual laptops, one in an unconnected Drive account, one is no longer produced at all — and separately, 2 of the most-used reports in the company were never described by anyone.

  • Buy the next machine, or not — due in Februarywaiting 42 days

    Line utilisation, which no connected source carries: the production log cannot be read

    The production log rebuilt as flat rows — already a quarter goal

  • Which customer gets the next rate conversationwaiting 4 days

    Margin by customer, which needs item-level cost the ledgers do not carry

    Item-level ledgers from the document collection — asked for, not yet supplied

  • Stop despatch to a customer whose cheque has bouncedno longer waiting

    Nothing, any longer — exposure by party is joined nightly. Before the join, the second bounce sat unconnected to the open invoices for 9 days

    Already unblocked — the first decision this system returned to the company

08

How the company runs itself: rung 2 of 5

The company runs itself at rung 2 of 5 — people carry what systems should.

  1. 1Run from memoryWhat happened is in someone's head. Nothing is written down that another person could pick up.
  2. 2Run on spreadsheetsyou are hereThe work is written down, in files that belong to whoever made them. Anyone can see their own part; nobody can see the whole.
  3. 3Run on tools that do not talkReal systems hold the work, but each answers only its own question. Joining them up is somebody's evening.
  4. 4Joined up and measuredThe systems reconcile with each other, and the numbers everyone argues from are the same numbers.
  5. 5Goals reach every person, and it corrects itselfEvery person's work traces to a company goal, drift is visible while there is still time, and the correction happens without the founder in the room.

Decided from

  • Five of the nine reports the company runs on cannot be read by anything except the person who makes them.What each person described about the reports they make · 26 Aug 2026
  • Two of the most-used files in the company are edited every working morning and were described by nobody.The connected shared drive - file listing and revision history · 26 Aug 2026 16:05
  • The daily production log's contents cannot be read at all — merged cells and formula columns — so no line output exists in any connected source.Daily Production Log (shared drive), registered cadence-only · 26 Aug 2026 06:20
  • The chart the company keeps and the people it describes disagree for seven of them.Each person's own selection when they confirmed their details · 26 Aug 2026

Accounting is further along than the rest: the books are in a real system and reconcile daily. The grade is set by production, dispatch and sales, which are not.

Rung 3Run on tools that do not talk

Rung 3 needs the work to live in systems rather than in files. Today the files are the systems, and half of them live on one person's laptop.

  • The reports the company runs on are readable by something other than the person who makes them.

    Nine reports run the company; four of them can be read

  • The production log can be read, so output exists as a number rather than a recollection.

    Capacity cannot be computed from anything connected

  • Enquiries land somewhere countable instead of in a mailbox nobody owns.

    Inbound arrives and nobody counts it

09

What could go wrong

Four things could go badly wrong soon. Two more are worth watching.

  • Act on thisOne customer's decision moves a third of the business

    Sundaram is 31% of billing and the top four are 68%. A rate cut, a schedule cut or a second-source decision at one of them lands on the whole company at once.

    The share is in the books and has grown. Whether any of them intends anything is not in any record we hold, and we will not guess it.

    Not priced. Pricing this needs margin by customer, which needs item-level cost the ledgers do not carry.

    What reduces it

    The rate conversation in the year goal, and one new account that is not powertrain.

  • Act on thisBeta Forgings' cheque has bounced twice

    ₹4,60,000 is outstanding against a party whose cheque has now returned a second time, ₹1,20,000 of it on the last attempt.

    Both returns are on the bank alert stream and both invoices are open in the books.

    The two open invoices at their outstanding balance.

    What reduces it

    Stop despatch against open balance, and take the older invoice before the newer.

  • Act on thisWhat the works head knows is not written down anywhere

    The person who runs the plant holds the schedule, the line allocation and the supplier history in his head. He is also listed as managing eleven people while actually managing five.

    He named it himself in the interview, and the artifact register found nothing written down behind it.

    Not priced. Nothing in the books puts a value on what one person knows.

    What reduces it

    The supervisor layer going on the chart, and the production log becoming readable by someone other than him.

  • Act on thisOne desk carries the whole of finance

    Filing, collections and the books all run through one person with nobody behind him. Returns have already gone in late when he was waiting on cash.

    The lateness is on the public record month by month. That there is nobody second is the founder's own account.

    Not priced. Late-filing interest and penalty are computable, but not from anything connected today.

    What reduces it

    The GST pack assembled ahead of the date, and a second person who can close a month.

  • Watch thisThe machine decision lands in February against a log nobody can read

    A capital decision is due while line utilisation cannot be computed from any connected source. It would be made on recollection.

    The production log is registered for its update times only; its contents cannot be parsed at all.

    Not priced. The size of the decision is known to the founder; nothing in the connected records carries it.

    What reduces it

    The production log rebuilt as flat rows, which the half-year goal already carries.

  • Watch thisThe second anchor has not ramped to what was promised

    Meridian is 22% of billing and is running at about half the volume the ramp promised. Capacity and people were added against the promise.

    The billing share is in the books. The ramp promise and the shortfall are the founder's account, not a record we hold.

    Not priced. The gap between promised and actual volume is not in any connected source.

    What reduces it

    Put the ramp in writing with a date, or re-plan the line allocation around what is actually arriving.

10

What a machine could do

Four pieces of repeat work a machine could take — two ready today, none switched on.

You moved the transporter booking to the top. Nine people named it and you have heard it yourself. It is also the one that cannot be switched on yet.

  1. 1Fill the transporter's booking form from the dispatch trackeryou moved this up 3

    The same dispatch details are typed a second time into the transporter's own booking portal, every working day.

    It repeats
    Named by 9 people across two functions as something that wastes time daily. (The one-to-one conversations, in totals)
    Time
    Nothing records how often the form is filled or how long it takes, so no hours are claimed.
    The goal it serves
    Not attached to one yet.
    A person approves
    Not decided yet.
    You would know by
    Bookings placed without a person re-typing them, as a share of bookings.

    Cannot be switched on until we have the arithmetic on time saved, the goal it serves, where a person approves.

  2. 2Send the nightly dispatch summary from the tracker

    A summary is written by hand each evening from the dispatch tracker and sent to six people from the shared dispatch mailbox.

    It repeats
    61 sends in 63 working days, from dispatch@ to six people. (The company's shared mailboxes - finance@, sales@, dispatch@)
    Time
    Five sends a week — 61 in 63 working days — at the twenty minutes its writer says each one takes.
    The goal it serves
    Not attached to one yet.
    A person approves
    The summary goes out only after the dispatch coordinator has released it, for the first month.
    You would know by
    Sends that went out on time without a person writing them, and any evening the tracker and the summary disagree.

    Cannot be switched on until we have the goal it serves.

  3. 3Record every enquiry as it landsyou moved this down 2

    Enquiries arrive through the website form, the phone and the shared sales mailbox, and are written down nowhere.

    It repeats
    One enquiry sent through the company's own contact form on 21 August was still unanswered four days later; no register exists to say how many others there were. (Corto enquiry sent through the customer's own contact form)
    Time
    This one does not save time. It creates a number that does not exist today — how many enquiries arrive, and how many become orders.
    The goal it serves
    One place every enquiry lands, and one person who owns it that day
    A person approves
    Nothing is answered automatically. The register captures; a person replies.
    You would know by
    Enquiries recorded against enquiries known to have arrived, and the share answered within one working day.

    Ready to switch on when you say so.

  4. 4Assemble the GST filing pack before the date, not after ityou moved this down 1

    The return is prepared at the last moment by one person, and has gone in late when the cash to pay it had not arrived.

    It repeats
    Filing lateness is on the public record, month by month. (GST portal — GSTR-1 filing history)
    Time
    The value here is the date being met, not the hours. How long the pack takes to assemble has never been measured.
    The goal it serves
    Clear the oldest money and stop filings waiting on cash
    A person approves
    The pack is assembled and shown. Nothing is filed by Corto, ever.
    You would know by
    Returns filed on or before the date, and the number of days between the pack being ready and the date.

    Ready to switch on when you say so.

11

What it is worth

₹42,00,000 is on the table now. The rest becomes priceable as records come alive.

₹42,00,000₹42,00,000 has been outstanding for more than sixty days
  • The largest customer is a third of the business, not a fifthNot priced · One customer's decision moves 31% of revenue. Not costed here — margin by customer needs item-level cost, which the ledgers do not carry.
  • A supervisor layer runs the floor and appears on no chartNot priced · Six of the eleven are in practice managed by someone the chart does not know about. Not costed — nothing in the books prices a reporting line.
  • Inbound arrives and nobody counts itNot priced · Not costed. One enquiry on one occasion is not a rate, and nothing in the public record can say how many arrived or what they were worth.
  • Nine reports run the company; four of them can be readNot priced · Five of the nine reports the company runs on cannot be read by anything except the person who makes them.
  • Capacity cannot be computed from anything connectedNot priced · Not costed. Nothing connected carries output, so any rupee here would be invented. The file's format, not the management, is the reason the number does not exist.