The full business review
Mehta Auto Components Pvt Ltd, Bhosari MIDC, Pune · assembled Monday 31 August · 6 findings
01Read this first
Read this first
Mehta Auto earns well, collects late, and runs on memory.
₹42,00,000 is waiting past sixty days. The collection cycle Anil calls 45–50 days runs at 74 in the books.
Four customers carry 68% of billing — and the head of sales says two of them are one buying group.
9 of the 32 people who sat for a conversation could say what the company is trying to achieve. 3 of the 6 findings are about records nobody can read.
Three moves this quarter
- 1Collect the four oldest invoices, one at a time. Accounts already carries the goal.
- 2Switch on the enquiry register. It is built; it waits on one approval.
- 3Agree the goals, and put one in front of every person.
3 of 4 heads have written back.
02Where the business stands, branch by branch
Four branches are strained, two are holding, and two cannot be graded at all.
Where the business stands, branch by branch
Four branches are strained, two are holding, and two cannot be graded at all.
- holdingDemand and customersagainst the industry on public record
Revenue grew and both anchors are still buying. The exposure, not the demand, is the problem: one customer is 31% and the top four are 68%.
Your revenue index rose to 112.5 over two filed years. The industry's rose to 120.1. You grew, and lost share while doing it.
- strainedPricing and marginagainst your own filed years
Anchor volume rose while anchor rates did not. Pricing power is demonstrable with small accounts and absent with the large ones.
Net margin by filed year is the only comparison available. Margin by customer needs item-level cost the ledgers do not carry, so the question 'which customer is the profitable one' cannot be answered at all.
- strainedCash and working capitalagainst the spread inside your own books
The collection cycle runs at 74 days against a belief of 45 to 50, and ₹42,00,000 is past sixty days.
The only customer settling inside 25 days is the smallest one on the list. Every anchor invoice is past sixty. The spread is not about the market — it is about which customers are asked.
- No record to read it fromCapacity and operationsno comparison exists
Line and machine output exist in no connected source. The daily production log is registered for its update times only, because its contents cannot be parsed.
Missing
A production log that can be read. Until then there is no number here to grade, and no honest way to invent one.
- No record to read it fromQuality and deliveryno comparison exists
The monthly rejection report was described in onboarding and is no longer produced. Nothing else records rework or rejection.
Missing
Any record of rejection or rework at all. This is the one branch where the data was once produced and stopped.
- strainedPeople and organisationagainst your own filed years
28% of the people asked could say what the company is trying to achieve, and it falls from 57% at the heads to 14% two levels down. Seven people work to someone other than the manager on the chart.
Contributing headcount is on the public record month by month, so growth in people can be set against growth in revenue. Nothing external measures whether people know the goal.
- strainedSystems and visibilityagainst your own filed years
Rung 2 of 5. Five of the nine reports the company runs on cannot be read by anything except the person who makes them, and two of the most-used files were described by nobody.
The rung is the comparison, and it is the one that moves quarter to quarter. Nothing outside this company grades it.
- holdingCompliance and governanceagainst your own filed years
Returns are filed, some of them late, and lateness has tracked cash rather than intent. The auditor has been continuous since 2016 and charges are properly registered.
Filing timeliness is on the public record month by month, so the pattern is visible against your own past without needing anyone else's.
036 findings
Six findings. One is priced; the money in the others arrives when their records exist.
6 findings
Six findings. One is priced; the money in the others arrives when their records exist.
Accounts₹42,00,000 has been outstanding for more than sixty days₹42,00,000
What we found
What it means
What it's worth
What to do
Records
- RecordTally - outstanding invoices with dates, via the read-only agent· Open invoices and ageing buckets· last sync 25 Aug 2026 19:40· in the books
- ComputedComputed by Corto· Average days to collect, trailing twelve months· 25 Aug 2026· in the books
- StatedThe founder, in his interview· Interview sittings 19 Aug 2026 - 22 Aug 2026· 22 Aug 2026
Corrected 24 Aug: the first draft counted a settled invoice. Accounts caught it before anyone else saw the document.
The head of Accounts had not responded when this was assembled on Monday 31 August.
CompanyThe largest customer is a third of the business, not a fifthDisagreed
What we found
What it means
What it's worth
What to do
Records
- RecordTally - party-wise sales ledgers, via the read-only agent· Party-wise billing FY26 YTD· last sync 25 Aug 2026 19:40· in the books
- StatedThe founder, in his interview· Interview sittings 19 Aug 2026 - 22 Aug 2026· 22 Aug 2026
31% is the billing share, not the risk. Two of the top four are the same buying group, so the real single-decision exposure is higher than the number here, not lower. Please show it that way before the meeting.
ProductionA supervisor layer runs the floor and appears on no chartConfirmed
What we found
What it means
What it's worth
What to do
Records
- StatedEmployee master spreadsheet supplied by the company· Mehta Auto - Employee Master (Jul 2026).xlsx, uploaded 19 Aug 2026· 19 Aug 2026
- StatedEach person's own selection when they confirmed their details· Details confirmed, to 26 Aug 2026· 26 Aug 2026
Correct, and it has been that way since the second line started. Put it on the chart.
SalesInbound arrives and nobody counts itAdded
What we found
What it means
What it's worth
What to do
Records
- RecordCorto enquiry sent through the customer's own contact form· Sent Thu 21 Aug 2026 16:10; observed to Mon 25 Aug 2026· 25 Aug 2026
- StatedThe founder, in his interview· Interview sittings 19 Aug 2026 - 22 Aug 2026· 22 Aug 2026
The form goes to a mailbox two of us can open and neither of us owns. The Nashik enquiry sat there four days for the same reason. We have asked for a shared sales inbox since March.
CompanyNine reports run the company; four of them can be readConfirmed
What we found
What it means
What it's worth
What to do
Records
- StatedWhat each person described about the reports they make· Artifact register, described rows, to 26 Aug 2026· 26 Aug 2026
- RecordThe connected shared drive - file listing and revision history· Drive scan, 26 Aug 2026· 26 Aug 2026 16:05
The head of Sales and The head of Production and Dispatch & Stores had not responded when this was assembled on Monday 31 August.
ProductionCapacity cannot be computed from anything connectedAdded
What we found
What it means
What it's worth
What to do
Records
- RecordDaily Production Log (shared drive), registered cadence-only· Daily Production Log.xlsx - merged cells and formula columns; content parsing off· 26 Aug 2026 06:20
- StatedThe founder, in his interview· Interview sittings 19 Aug 2026 - 22 Aug 2026· 22 Aug 2026
The merged cells are mine. I built the sheet that way so it prints on one page for the morning meeting. I can keep a flat copy alongside it.
04Does everyone know where this is going?
The plan in people's heads is not the plan — 9 of 32 carry all three parts of it.
Does everyone know where this is going?
The plan in people's heads is not the plan — 9 of 32 carry all three parts of it.
- “In your own words, what is this company trying to achieve this year?”14 of 32 clear
“Sell more than last year, I think. Nobody has told us a number.”
“Keep Sundaram happy. That is the goal as far as I can see.”
“One hundred fifty crore by 2029. And exports. It was said at Diwali.”
- “What's your part in that?”12 of 32 clear
“If my part moves late, the invoice goes out late. That much I know.”
“I do my work. How it connects to the top, honestly, nobody has ever drawn me that line.”
- “What would a good week look like for you?”9 of 32 clear
“A good week is when nobody shouts. That is the only measure I have.”
“No complaints from the customer, no breakdown. Beyond that I would not know how to score it.”
Where it is lost
- Department heads57%
- Their teams22%
- One level below that14%
The founder's own level is not here. His conversation was the interview, and the rubric everyone else was scored against is built from what he said in it.
Departments too small to report on their own are counted here but not shown separately: Leadership (1) · Purchase (2) · HR & Admin (2).
Nobody in Maintenance has been asked yet, so it is not in this number at all.
05What gets in the way
The same obstructions repeat across departments, in the counts people gave them.
What gets in the way
The same obstructions repeat across departments, in the counts people gave them.
- 9Transporter booking app wastes time daily
“Same details, typed twice, every single day. The tracker and then their portal.”
Named in Production.
Also named in a department too small to report separately — the count includes them, the name does not.
- 8Dispatch and accounts don't share information
“The people loading the truck know things the office finds out three days later. Same building.”
Named in Sales.
Named by people in three functions; two of them are too small to report separately.
- 15No clarity on what counts as a good week
“Tell me what number I am supposed to move and I will move it. Nobody ever has.”
Named in Production and Sales.
Also named in a department too small to report separately.
06Where what you told us and what the books say do not match
Where memory and the books disagree, both are kept.
Where what you told us and what the books say do not match
Where memory and the books disagree, both are kept.
You said
top customer ~20-22% — twice, two days apart
The books say
31%; top-4 = 68%
You said
money made in precision/Sundaram work
The books say
margin by customer uncomputed — his own declined number
You said
inbound is junk
The books say
last new customer originated inbound
You said
collections 45-50 days
The books say
74 days
You said
power is 3-4% of cost
The books say
6.8%
You said
capacity utilisation ~80%
The books say
not computable from any connected source
07What we could not see, and what it is costing
What we could not see, and what it is costing
Of 9 described reports, four are in a system Corto can read. Three live on individual laptops, one in an unconnected Drive account, one is no longer produced at all — and separately, 2 of the most-used reports in the company were never described by anyone.
- Buy the next machine, or not — due in Februarywaiting 42 days
Line utilisation, which no connected source carries: the production log cannot be read
The production log rebuilt as flat rows — already a quarter goal
- Which customer gets the next rate conversationwaiting 4 days
Margin by customer, which needs item-level cost the ledgers do not carry
Item-level ledgers from the document collection — asked for, not yet supplied
- Stop despatch to a customer whose cheque has bouncedno longer waiting
Nothing, any longer — exposure by party is joined nightly. Before the join, the second bounce sat unconnected to the open invoices for 9 days
Already unblocked — the first decision this system returned to the company
08How the company runs itself: rung 2 of 5
The company runs itself at rung 2 of 5 — people carry what systems should.
How the company runs itself: rung 2 of 5
The company runs itself at rung 2 of 5 — people carry what systems should.
- 1Run from memoryWhat happened is in someone's head. Nothing is written down that another person could pick up.
- 2Run on spreadsheetsyou are hereThe work is written down, in files that belong to whoever made them. Anyone can see their own part; nobody can see the whole.
- 3Run on tools that do not talkReal systems hold the work, but each answers only its own question. Joining them up is somebody's evening.
- 4Joined up and measuredThe systems reconcile with each other, and the numbers everyone argues from are the same numbers.
- 5Goals reach every person, and it corrects itselfEvery person's work traces to a company goal, drift is visible while there is still time, and the correction happens without the founder in the room.
Decided from
- Five of the nine reports the company runs on cannot be read by anything except the person who makes them.What each person described about the reports they make · 26 Aug 2026
- Two of the most-used files in the company are edited every working morning and were described by nobody.The connected shared drive - file listing and revision history · 26 Aug 2026 16:05
- The daily production log's contents cannot be read at all — merged cells and formula columns — so no line output exists in any connected source.Daily Production Log (shared drive), registered cadence-only · 26 Aug 2026 06:20
- The chart the company keeps and the people it describes disagree for seven of them.Each person's own selection when they confirmed their details · 26 Aug 2026
Accounting is further along than the rest: the books are in a real system and reconcile daily. The grade is set by production, dispatch and sales, which are not.
Rung 3 — Run on tools that do not talk
Rung 3 needs the work to live in systems rather than in files. Today the files are the systems, and half of them live on one person's laptop.
The reports the company runs on are readable by something other than the person who makes them.
Nine reports run the company; four of them can be read
The production log can be read, so output exists as a number rather than a recollection.
Capacity cannot be computed from anything connected
Enquiries land somewhere countable instead of in a mailbox nobody owns.
Inbound arrives and nobody counts it
09What could go wrong
Four things could go badly wrong soon. Two more are worth watching.
What could go wrong
Four things could go badly wrong soon. Two more are worth watching.
- Act on thisOne customer's decision moves a third of the business
Sundaram is 31% of billing and the top four are 68%. A rate cut, a schedule cut or a second-source decision at one of them lands on the whole company at once.
The share is in the books and has grown. Whether any of them intends anything is not in any record we hold, and we will not guess it.
Not priced. Pricing this needs margin by customer, which needs item-level cost the ledgers do not carry.
What reduces it
The rate conversation in the year goal, and one new account that is not powertrain.
- Act on thisBeta Forgings' cheque has bounced twice
₹4,60,000 is outstanding against a party whose cheque has now returned a second time, ₹1,20,000 of it on the last attempt.
Both returns are on the bank alert stream and both invoices are open in the books.
The two open invoices at their outstanding balance.
What reduces it
Stop despatch against open balance, and take the older invoice before the newer.
- Act on thisWhat the works head knows is not written down anywhere
The person who runs the plant holds the schedule, the line allocation and the supplier history in his head. He is also listed as managing eleven people while actually managing five.
He named it himself in the interview, and the artifact register found nothing written down behind it.
Not priced. Nothing in the books puts a value on what one person knows.
What reduces it
The supervisor layer going on the chart, and the production log becoming readable by someone other than him.
- Act on thisOne desk carries the whole of finance
Filing, collections and the books all run through one person with nobody behind him. Returns have already gone in late when he was waiting on cash.
The lateness is on the public record month by month. That there is nobody second is the founder's own account.
Not priced. Late-filing interest and penalty are computable, but not from anything connected today.
What reduces it
The GST pack assembled ahead of the date, and a second person who can close a month.
- Watch thisThe machine decision lands in February against a log nobody can read
A capital decision is due while line utilisation cannot be computed from any connected source. It would be made on recollection.
The production log is registered for its update times only; its contents cannot be parsed at all.
Not priced. The size of the decision is known to the founder; nothing in the connected records carries it.
What reduces it
The production log rebuilt as flat rows, which the half-year goal already carries.
- Watch thisThe second anchor has not ramped to what was promised
Meridian is 22% of billing and is running at about half the volume the ramp promised. Capacity and people were added against the promise.
The billing share is in the books. The ramp promise and the shortfall are the founder's account, not a record we hold.
Not priced. The gap between promised and actual volume is not in any connected source.
What reduces it
Put the ramp in writing with a date, or re-plan the line allocation around what is actually arriving.
10What a machine could do
Four pieces of repeat work a machine could take — two ready today, none switched on.
What a machine could do
Four pieces of repeat work a machine could take — two ready today, none switched on.
You moved the transporter booking to the top. Nine people named it and you have heard it yourself. It is also the one that cannot be switched on yet.
- 1Fill the transporter's booking form from the dispatch trackeryou moved this up 3
The same dispatch details are typed a second time into the transporter's own booking portal, every working day.
- It repeats
- Named by 9 people across two functions as something that wastes time daily. (The one-to-one conversations, in totals)
- Time
- Nothing records how often the form is filled or how long it takes, so no hours are claimed.
- The goal it serves
- Not attached to one yet.
- A person approves
- Not decided yet.
- You would know by
- Bookings placed without a person re-typing them, as a share of bookings.
Cannot be switched on until we have the arithmetic on time saved, the goal it serves, where a person approves.
- 2Send the nightly dispatch summary from the tracker
A summary is written by hand each evening from the dispatch tracker and sent to six people from the shared dispatch mailbox.
- It repeats
- 61 sends in 63 working days, from dispatch@ to six people. (The company's shared mailboxes - finance@, sales@, dispatch@)
- Time
- Five sends a week — 61 in 63 working days — at the twenty minutes its writer says each one takes.
- The goal it serves
- Not attached to one yet.
- A person approves
- The summary goes out only after the dispatch coordinator has released it, for the first month.
- You would know by
- Sends that went out on time without a person writing them, and any evening the tracker and the summary disagree.
Cannot be switched on until we have the goal it serves.
- 3Record every enquiry as it landsyou moved this down 2
Enquiries arrive through the website form, the phone and the shared sales mailbox, and are written down nowhere.
- It repeats
- One enquiry sent through the company's own contact form on 21 August was still unanswered four days later; no register exists to say how many others there were. (Corto enquiry sent through the customer's own contact form)
- Time
- This one does not save time. It creates a number that does not exist today — how many enquiries arrive, and how many become orders.
- The goal it serves
- One place every enquiry lands, and one person who owns it that day
- A person approves
- Nothing is answered automatically. The register captures; a person replies.
- You would know by
- Enquiries recorded against enquiries known to have arrived, and the share answered within one working day.
Ready to switch on when you say so.
- 4Assemble the GST filing pack before the date, not after ityou moved this down 1
The return is prepared at the last moment by one person, and has gone in late when the cash to pay it had not arrived.
- It repeats
- Filing lateness is on the public record, month by month. (GST portal — GSTR-1 filing history)
- Time
- The value here is the date being met, not the hours. How long the pack takes to assemble has never been measured.
- The goal it serves
- Clear the oldest money and stop filings waiting on cash
- A person approves
- The pack is assembled and shown. Nothing is filed by Corto, ever.
- You would know by
- Returns filed on or before the date, and the number of days between the pack being ready and the date.
Ready to switch on when you say so.
11What it is worth
₹42,00,000 is on the table now. The rest becomes priceable as records come alive.
What it is worth
₹42,00,000 is on the table now. The rest becomes priceable as records come alive.
- The largest customer is a third of the business, not a fifthNot priced · One customer's decision moves 31% of revenue. Not costed here — margin by customer needs item-level cost, which the ledgers do not carry.
- A supervisor layer runs the floor and appears on no chartNot priced · Six of the eleven are in practice managed by someone the chart does not know about. Not costed — nothing in the books prices a reporting line.
- Inbound arrives and nobody counts itNot priced · Not costed. One enquiry on one occasion is not a rate, and nothing in the public record can say how many arrived or what they were worth.
- Nine reports run the company; four of them can be readNot priced · Five of the nine reports the company runs on cannot be read by anything except the person who makes them.
- Capacity cannot be computed from anything connectedNot priced · Not costed. Nothing connected carries output, so any rupee here would be invented. The file's format, not the management, is the reason the number does not exist.