Why this goal

demowho and where

Not a feature. Sign-in decides both of these; until then, this does.

Demo map
Goals

Why this goal

Bad material is caught at the gate, not at assembly

Tejas Bhoir · Quality

Tejas wrote this. Everything below is what Corto can show about where it came from and whether it holds up — including what it cannot stand behind.

Where it came from

A goal Corto proposed has a reason it exists. This is that reason, with the record behind it.

No finding sits behind this one. It was written by its owner rather than proposed from the diagnosis, which is not a fault — but it means Corto cannot tell you why it exists, only whether it holds up.

It serves What the company owes and what it is owed stop pulling in opposite directions., a department goal.

What Corto read

2

Every record under every number in this goal — where it came from, how it was read, and when it was true.

  • Corto, rejections and non-conformances

    from a filed or system record

    Used for: Supplier defects caught at incoming rather than later: 40% → 85%

    The record
    ncrs.json, the quality register
    How read
    read of the tenant's own records
    True as of
    26 Aug 2026 · refreshed daily
  • Corto procurement

    from a filed or system record

    Used for: Incoming lots inspected within a day: 61% → 95%

    The record
    procurement.json
    How read
    read of the tenant's own records
    True as of
    26 Aug 2026 · refreshed daily

Why these key results are enough

If every one of them lands, is the goal true? If the answer is no, the goal is measuring the wrong things.

A supplier defect found at assembly costs a shift; found at the gate it costs a phone call. Where it is caught is the outcome.

Is it a good goal

4 of 5

SMART, checked against the goal itself. Where Corto asks more than SMART does, it says so — it is not a badge, it is what was actually tested.

  • S

    Specific

    holds

    The goal names a change, and leaves every number to its key results.

    SMART asks a goal to be specific. Corto asks it to be specific WITHOUT a number in it, so the target can move without rewriting what the company is trying to do.

  • M

    Measurable

    holds

    All 2 key results carry a start value, a target, a unit and the record they are read from.

    SMART asks for a number. Corto asks WHERE THE NUMBER COMES FROM — the actual record — because a target nobody can read is not measurable, it is only numeric.

  • A

    Achievable

    not yet

    Nothing is being done about this yet — no initiative sits under it.

    Corto does not judge whether an ambition is realistic — that is the founder's to set. It checks the two things it can see: that somebody is working on it, and that the number can actually be read.

  • R

    Relevant

    holds

    It serves “What the company owes and what it is owed stop pulling in opposite directions.”, which is Purchase's.

    SMART asks whether a goal matters. Corto asks WHAT IT SERVES, by name, all the way up to one of the three destinations — so relevance is a chain you can follow rather than an opinion.

  • T

    Time-bound

    holds

    It runs to FY 2026-27, and nothing is scored before that period begins.

What Corto cannot stand behind

2

Read this before you argue with anybody using the rest of the page. A case that states no limit is a sales sheet.

  • What Corto, rejections and non-conformances cannot tell you

    a defect nobody raised an NCR forthe cost of a rejection unless it was priced

  • What Corto procurement cannot tell you

    a supplier's reason unless somebody wrote it downlanded cost unless the bill carries it

Assembled from records that already existed — the diagnosis, the interview, the derivation registry and the goal itself. Nothing on this page is written about the goal after the fact. The line to the destination