Anil Mehta · Company
Anil wrote this. Everything below is what Corto can show about where it came from and whether it holds up — including what it cannot stand behind.
Where it came from
A goal Corto proposed has a reason it exists. This is that reason, with the record behind it.
No finding sits behind this one. It was written by its owner rather than proposed from the diagnosis, which is not a fault — but it means Corto cannot tell you why it exists, only whether it holds up.
From the interview
Corto asked: Now the question all of this is for. Three years — if everything were in your hands, what is Mehta Auto?
One hundred and fifty crore. Twenty percent export. And a name of our own in components — people should say, if it is a Mehta part there is no tension. And no more of this life that hangs on one customer.
That chain ends at Nobody can end us with one phone call, one of the three destinations.
What Corto read
2Every record under every number in this goal — where it came from, how it was read, and when it was true.
DGFT — IEC search
from a filed or system recordUsed for: Import-export registration in place
- The record
- PAN-linked lookup, nil result
- How read
- public register lookup
- True as of
- 24 Aug 2026 · refreshed on change
Tally - party-wise sales ledgers, via the read-only agent
from a filed or system recordUsed for: One export order shipped
- The record
- Party-wise billing FY26 YTD
- How read
- read-only export from the customer's own accounting system, with their consent
- True as of
- last sync 25 Aug 2026 19:40 · refreshed daily
Why these key results are enough
If every one of them lands, is the goal true? If the answer is no, the goal is measuring the wrong things.
A first export order and the registration that makes it legal are together the whole of a first step. Neither alone is a beginning.
Is it a good goal
5 of 5SMART, checked against the goal itself. Where Corto asks more than SMART does, it says so — it is not a badge, it is what was actually tested.
- S
Specific
holdsThe goal names a change, and leaves every number to its key results.
SMART asks a goal to be specific. Corto asks it to be specific WITHOUT a number in it, so the target can move without rewriting what the company is trying to do.
- M
Measurable
holdsAll 2 key results carry a start value, a target, a unit and the record they are read from.
SMART asks for a number. Corto asks WHERE THE NUMBER COMES FROM — the actual record — because a target nobody can read is not measurable, it is only numeric.
- A
Achievable
holds2 initiatives are under it, and every key result reads from a record that exists.
Corto does not judge whether an ambition is realistic — that is the founder's to set. It checks the two things it can see: that somebody is working on it, and that the number can actually be read.
- R
Relevant
holdsIt hangs off the pillar “Sell where the rupee is worth more”.
SMART asks whether a goal matters. Corto asks WHAT IT SERVES, by name, all the way up to one of the three destinations — so relevance is a chain you can follow rather than an opinion.
- T
Time-bound
holdsIt runs to FY 2026-27, and nothing is scored before that period begins.
What Corto cannot stand behind
2Read this before you argue with anybody using the rest of the page. A case that states no limit is a sales sheet.
What DGFT — IEC search cannot tell you
absence of indirect or deemed exportsabsence of export revenue routed through a merchant exporterany statement about total export exposure
What Tally - party-wise sales ledgers, via the read-only agent cannot tell you
margin by customer, which needs item-level costtonnage or quantityanything outside the sync windowperiods before the ledger was opened
Assembled from records that already existed — the diagnosis, the interview, the derivation registry and the goal itself. Nothing on this page is written about the goal after the fact. The line to the destination